Share this comment
Still wrong, now aggressive and highly defensive.
I stated the proper jobs of government and you may not pervert the clear language to suit your agenda.
State what you feel are the proper jobs of govt. You can't begin organize your thoughts.
Likewise, you have no idea how to even approach the total, baleful impact of govt. on the economy. Y…
Still wrong, now aggressive and highly defensive.
I stated the proper jobs of government and you may not pervert the clear language to suit your agenda.
State what you feel are the proper jobs of govt. You can't begin organize your thoughts.
Likewise, you have no idea how to even approach the total, baleful impact of govt. on the economy. You have no grasp that cash taxes are under half the total take. That must include unfunded mandates, borrowing, burden of laws, rules, regulations, the fraud of OASDHI, and worst of all, the hidden theft of deliberate inflation.
That last is the cruelest tax of all, hitting the poorest the hardest.
Prove you have a grasp of economics.
you are saying a bunch of unrelated crapola because you know very gosh darn well that "defend the border" does not mean what you are using it to mean.
you also know gosh darn well that "preserve free markets" is found nowhere in the constitution. you're sticking it in because you think it's a self-evidently good idea. i may agree, but that stands on no different ground from anyone else's assertions about what are self-evidently good ideas.
irritating as it is, we have to examine each "self-evidently good idea" by itself and on its own merits. if those ideas are found to be in fact bad, then they should be abandoned.
i accuse your beloved i.c.e. of having a massively damaging effect on the economy. i posit that were we to fling wide again the golden door, we would have a rapid increase in all those numbers you like so much, and further, that had we done so a hundred years ago, we would now have more people than china, and an economy of simply unimaginable size.
your closing of the door to newcomers is, furthermore, far more contrary to the spirit of america than a little grifting -- and while a parasite or a cancer may be purged from the body, there is no post-facto cure for congenital stunting. have you ever cut open a dog? LOTS of parasites in there. dog still works. a dog raised in a cage, meanwhile, will never run.
this is all rather beside the point, which is that either we are strict constitutionalists in terms of the permitted domains of federal government, or we are not - and you have already avowed that you are not. (don't feel bad. almost no one is.) what i believe is not particularly relevant.
Fascinating fantasies. You impute your own meanings to my word. You set up a “strawman,” and STILL you cannot win against your hapless opponent. Henceforth you will speak for yourself alone. Dispute if you are able, that which I state so clearly.
That noted, America is sovereign country. We admit only those who will, in our sole judgement, benefit America. You cannot object to that, nor to proper vetting of newcomers.
Sadly, the hate-America left has opened the borders to invasion by criminals and takers, freeloaders on the over-generous welfare.
Just one example. Minneapolis has been ravaged by criminal drug gangs. You cannot deny that.
You have not, because you cannot, articulate the proper jobs of govt. You are innumerate, and have not, because you cannot, discuss how much of the economy govt. may take for those limited jobs.
Think about that. Be ready to discuss, before you post again.
you lost every right to say anything about criminal thugs when you voted for the goon-in-chief, you f*cking moron. you have shit on america, and you rub lady liberty's nose in it every day he leaks in his diapers in the oval office.
wash yourself of that fetid stink before you say again the name of the united states of america.
it is the homeless, tempest-tossed, who have made this nation great, and they will again. i trust in that, for lack of much hope in this present low-down crew.
and i do mean both sides, before you twist your panties. a vote for trump was merely traitorous and rank: to vote for the child castrators would have been monstrous and inhuman.
as for where i shit, i shit on your dismal numbers. i speak of freedom: i speak of the principles of liberty. i would speak of them starving, lame, and chained. you, free, full, and fat, would bar your brother from your house so you can have a few more crumbs to yourself. you are no man.
I love it when you talk dirty to me.
Also, it's all here in red and green...
https://manhattan.institute/article/massive-reduction-in-global-poverty-might-be-the-most-important-development-in-the-world
Midnight bell.
You wanna fuck, you're fucking with me now.
You keep not your brother, and set up a golden cow?
I'll put a fucking bullet right between your eyebrows.
Some laws are older than the Constitution:
Justice is harsh, if it's the old law you're choosing.
Shit's gonna get real. I'm done fucking schmoozing.