119 Comments
User's avatar
Lucy's avatar

This is a key point that most people don’t seem to understand: “Yes, public university professors, such as those at New College, have a First Amendment right to promote gender pseudoscience—but they are not entitled to an unlimited state subsidy for that speech.”

Laura Alexander's avatar

To me, the subject should be addressed through a medical and psychological science view including the study of genetics. Young people that have medically proven differences such as Aphallia, Clitoromegaly, Chordee, Ovotestis (Hermaphrodism}, Hirsutism, Masculine Women with a higher baseline level of male hormones like testosterone are all very real science issues.

Also the National Library of Medicine study using MRI scans found physical differenced in the brains of gay males. LINK https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6168246/

Reasons why a person is born with certain tendencies or acquires certain tendencies are issues that could be taught in a psychology course to students.

Whenever a student has a tell-tale sign of non-conforming appearance or voice they are often ridiculed and your child or mine could face poor mental health issues for all of their life based on other people's opinions.

6% of the USA is gay. In a group of 50 people that is three people. (As long as we aren't talking about San Francisco or Portland, Oregon where it is much higher.)

I am not "for" teaching all students that you can walk in a classroom straight and after 45-minutes of teacher grooming and exposure to nonsense they could reach the hallway and change course.

Let's teach science and genetics and psychology.

Paulette Altmaier's avatar

Great progress! Congratulations on having the courage to make decisive reforms. Very encouraging

Ohlfearnain's avatar

This is definitely the good news story of the day!!Congratulations!

Orest's avatar

Damm. This was good to read. Kudos.

Sandra Pinches's avatar

It's really good to hear that many students and educators are eager to join the New College on the next leg of its journey. I am not surprised!

I would have selected the Iliad instead of the Odyssey, but either way, Homer rocks!

Christopher F. Rufo's avatar

It will get students interested and wanting to read more!

Tommaso di Maria's avatar

I can't argue with your choice, but I always choke up when I recall Odysseus' dog whom the gods permitted to live - if he willed to, and he did - until his master's return. If I recall correctly, it was only the dog who recognized Odysseus...until the archery competition!

On that note, the fate of the suitors seems to me just. Like so many we see, they were pretenders who squandered the estate of another in their absurd vanity.

Ernest D. Lieberman's avatar

My realistic reading of Homer's Odyssey places Penelope's recognition of Odysseus much earlier. I hope you enjoy reading "Penelope and Odysseus."

https://ernestdlieberman.substack.com/s/penelope-and-odysseus

Tommaso di Maria's avatar

Thank you - it has been awhile, and this tells me that it is time to live with that great book, again!

John Rock Foster's avatar

There was not a wild beast in the forest that could get away from him when he was once on its tracks. But now he has fallen on evil times, for his master is dead and gone, and the women take no care of him. Servants never do their work when their master's hand is no longer over them, for Zeus takes half the goodness out of a man when he makes a slave of him.'

So saying he entered the well-built mansion and made straight for the riotous pretenders in the hall. But Argos passed into the darkness of death, now that he had fulfilled his destiny of faith and seen his master once more after twenty years.

Sandra Pinches's avatar

A friend commented to me with some exasperation that, “Odysseus didn’t have a spiritual transformation during his journey! He was an AH when he left and he was still an AH when he got back!”

My beef was with

Agamemnon, for murdering Iphigenia.

Tommaso di Maria's avatar

Odysseus was a frightful man - as the suitors discovered.

G M's avatar

Keep up the good work.

Truth will prevail, though it might be a long, hard struggle to get there.

Kevin O'Halloran's avatar

Great work! Makes me happy to subscribe.

Laurie Newsom's avatar

Great to hear that the incoming freshman class is so robust. As a lifelong resident of Florida and a University of Florida graduate I clearly remember the reputation of New College from its inception being that of an easy curriculum which attracted the laziest students very few of which became well schooled productive citizens. Kudos to you and all your hard work!

Christopher F. Rufo's avatar

We are changing that quickly!

Damon Cochran's avatar

I graduated from New College in 1994 with a degree in English lit and philosophy. The humanities faculty at that time was for the most part blessedly apolitical in their teaching. There was some leftist foolishness among the students at times, of course, but my experience was overwhelmingly positive. It was in grad school that I first saw up close the political corruption of Academia.

Laura Marks's avatar

Interesting. It was definitely during my time there that I first heard of Critical Theory, Derrida and deconstruction. It was just a faddish side-gig then though, and I was only exposed to it second hand. Womyn’s Studies was becoming a thing at that time, for sure. Then again, I was holed up in Nat Sci trying to survive organic chemistry and vertebrate anatomy classes.

Laura Marks's avatar

Really? When I was there (1990-95) the curriculum was quite challenging. Yes, there was a healthy cohort of lazy stoners, but they didn’t tend to last long. They were mainly in the humanities though. Maybe us Natural Science nerds were different. 😉

Gerda Ho's avatar

Good ! The DIE program needs to DIE ( change in the letter sequence deliberate) ! It’s nothing but propaganda .

The “ Gender Studies “ is also just a bunch of anti - science hogwash , and not worthy of a college course! Other colleges should follow your example . This is coming from a former liberal! Many of us have had it with the authoritarian gender cult!

John Rock Foster's avatar

FANTASTIC! KUDOS!! Well done!

What amazing things can be done with some brains and backbone! So proud of you guys.

Surak's avatar

I wish I could like this column 100 times. Are there any openings for faculty...? :)

Mary Lindewirth's avatar

Bravo!!!

Tory's avatar

Christopher,

What a commendable job you have done. Congratulations! You are a bright light in a dark storm of our Nation. For my birthday, it was your new book I requested

On our library shelf. A toast to today’s encouragement and a crucial hope for our next generation.

Eric Rasmusen's avatar

You don't need to appeal to Gender Studies being a politicized field, tho it is. The Trustees have the right and the obligation to direct the strategy of the university. That includes choice of the fields it will teach. The Trustees can and should eliminate the biology department, if they think that is an inappropriate field for the college. Or, they might add a Central Eurasian Studies. That is not a matter of academic freedom at all. The Trustees decide policy; the faculty implement it. If the Trustees tell history professors to teach American history a certain way, that might implicate academic freedom, but not if the Trustees just tell the history department to teach American history instead of women's history or Chinese history.

Brian Villanueva's avatar

Finally someone who knows how to go on offense for a change!

Loving Mom's avatar

Fabulous! Keep up the good work.