6 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
RMac's avatar

It’s a cabal of power brokers behind the scenes and those in front who carry out the orders. In present case, power brokers you see from time to time: Obamas, Clintons et al, Clooney Hollywood et al, Soros billionaires et al. Runners: Schumer, Pelosi, Nadler etc., Huma Abedin, Susan Rice, Valerie Jarrett, Letitia James. On and on, many more, deep into the organization. They exert tremendous influence on all those elected and on staff.

Expand full comment
Porter's avatar

Think you are very close but believe there's a layer higher. A cabal of maybe a dozen or more intelligence/military industrialist/banksters- old money, old power. Not Zuckerberg or Gates or any other silicon valley "titan". This cabal probably greased the skids for their success and a few select politicians- Obama, Clinton's, McConnell, etc. When you look at Obama's history, lack of accomplishment and subsequent impact on the political scene the only thing making any sense is an unknown benefactor. So there's "somebody" out there. Question is- what's their motivation? Destruction of the USA? Pure unbridled, concentrated power? Sick amusement? Something else altogether? I don't exactly know but do know it's not any good for any of us.

Expand full comment
RMac's avatar

Yes, agree. Those I listed are them we see. They are pretty obvious. They are the them who serve the ones we don't see. The Money (dynastic money, old money as you suggest, the "men who built America"). They are few, but there is no ONE to point to. Politics serves corporate wealth and power. Politics serves the elite no matter who they are, and they are all the same people (even when we get a few new ones- Elon, Bezos). The rank and file 1%-ers put their money in the party they believe their money will be most protected and preserved and where they think the power will be- age old (i.e, DeSantis in his early phase until he lost steam and they all very quickly shifted, however reluctantly, to Trump). 1%-ers don't necessarily have party affiliation, as they are all aligned with getting the most value for their money and keeping it. They are aligned in keeping it. They will not destroy each other, even when the Soros' and Thiels' of the world collide. The tech billionaires influence in another good old-fashioned way- monopoly, and in the new social engineering way- mind control, then provide money to whoever serve those interests best and keeps them alive. Corporations- and the few- still rule. That's why Trump has such a wide appeal to the working classes. He is the hoped for catalyst and would-be breaker of the corrupt rules he himself participated in. Hierarchy is a crazy game. Always has been. What the masses forget is that the power, like Dorothy's ruby slippers, has been with them all along. Just stop. All at once. However, that requires UNITY, and UNITY is the very powerful thing They keep from Us.

Expand full comment
Porter's avatar

Absolutely agree 100%. Keeping us at each others throats has always been their most fundamental play. I think Trump is forcing many people to confront that fact and maybe, just maybe, they've overplayed their hand.

Expand full comment
Frans Susan Phillips Duncan's avatar

I believe the cabal is global and consists of the ones you mentioned plus the WEF, CIA, FBI. However, Obama, McConnell, Clintons, Pelosi, Biden, etc. are nothing but stooges who do what the cabal dictates. The cabal's motivation is communism. It's been oozing into the US like slime since the 1950s. The civil rights act is a perfect example of communist slime. It was never intended to uplift blacks. The intention has always been to destroy whites and the civilization we've built through the ages. Non-whites are the cannon fodder!

Expand full comment
Porter's avatar

Just finished reading a post by "millennial woes" on the same subject. He's a Scottish guy commenting on the UK destruction by the same means as here, very depressing & discouraging. If he (and you) are correct, the replacement theory is real and started almost 60 years ago. I used to think it was the "commies" but I'm beginning to think of communism as a "lubricant", a device to win over the young/stupid/poor to lessen the resistance (friction) to the ultimate plan. This global cabal is smart enough to know communism never works but can be a useful tool. But tool for what exactly? They have to know continually importing third worlders will only result in burning it all down. They then rule over the ruined remains? That makes no sense to me, unless the primary force behind the cabal is..... the Saudis.

Quit your laughing. Go read MW, give it some thought and get back to me. Don't have this completely flushed out but when I think about the motive, opportunity and means it's starting to make some sense.... AP

Expand full comment