There is a world of difference between showing empathy to a person's predicament as opposed to refusing to accept an ideological statement that is devoid of a factual predicate
There is a world of difference between showing empathy to a person's predicament as opposed to refusing to accept an ideological statement that is devoid of a factual predicate
Unfortunately now, they’ve argued loudly that the facts are the cornerstone of their oppression. Speaking in accordance to the facts is considered harassment. I’m thinking pronouns here for example. This is the tyranny of fear and the enforcement of silence built into DEI training and how corporate compliance is forced. You’ll lose your job over a pronoun, even though being factually correct. In my opinion, principled people have been quickly trapped, and quite literally are being forced to lie.
There is a world of difference between showing empathy to a person's predicament as opposed to refusing to accept an ideological statement that is devoid of a factual predicate
Unfortunately now, they’ve argued loudly that the facts are the cornerstone of their oppression. Speaking in accordance to the facts is considered harassment. I’m thinking pronouns here for example. This is the tyranny of fear and the enforcement of silence built into DEI training and how corporate compliance is forced. You’ll lose your job over a pronoun, even though being factually correct. In my opinion, principled people have been quickly trapped, and quite literally are being forced to lie.