The content of the ideology matters as to what the ideologists will/plan to do in-reality, but ultimately - if I am correct - ideology's content is arbitrary. We have seen how it sheds/accretes "content" overnight and w/o regard for consistency (i.e. reality). It is a product of the imagination, rather than of reality. Voegelin called it…
The content of the ideology matters as to what the ideologists will/plan to do in-reality, but ultimately - if I am correct - ideology's content is arbitrary. We have seen how it sheds/accretes "content" overnight and w/o regard for consistency (i.e. reality). It is a product of the imagination, rather than of reality. Voegelin called it a "gnostic dream-world."
The amount of recycled National Socialism within Bourgeois Radicalism demonstrates this point.
This leads to the only proper solutions - defeating it in-reality, or waiting for reality to defeat it, later.
Yes, I believe these ideologies are just intellectual rationalizations of underlying non-rational psychological impulses. The ideas may change, but the underlying psychological impulses remain the same.
The content of the ideology matters as to what the ideologists will/plan to do in-reality, but ultimately - if I am correct - ideology's content is arbitrary. We have seen how it sheds/accretes "content" overnight and w/o regard for consistency (i.e. reality). It is a product of the imagination, rather than of reality. Voegelin called it a "gnostic dream-world."
The amount of recycled National Socialism within Bourgeois Radicalism demonstrates this point.
This leads to the only proper solutions - defeating it in-reality, or waiting for reality to defeat it, later.
Yes, I believe these ideologies are just intellectual rationalizations of underlying non-rational psychological impulses. The ideas may change, but the underlying psychological impulses remain the same.
I go into more detail on this here:
https://frompovertytoprogress.substack.com/p/understanding-the-left